What Webdadi does well
They are straightforward and quick, and they do not dress a simple website up as something it is not. If the agency needs a decent, working website next week for very little money, Webdadi are a good answer and we will point you at them rather than waste your morning.
| Webdadi | AgentKit | |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Templates, and a bespoke tier | Bespoke only, one agency per patch |
| Published price | £0, £3,299, £4,399, bespoke from £5,499 sourceChecked 23 September 2026 | From £10,000, published |
| Tie-in | Not published | None. The optional monthly is thirty days' notice |
| Owned by | Independent | Independent |
Why agents look for an alternative
Speed is the product
Their tiers are sold on how fast the site appears: the free one in 24 hours, the paid ones in four to twelve weeks. Nothing designed in a day is designed around your patch, your stock and the way you win instructions.
Cheap sets the ceiling
£0, £3,299 and £4,399 are honest prices for what they are. At that level the design has to work for hundreds of agencies, so the parts that would make it yours are the parts that cannot be there.
The vendor journey is the gap
Most template sites end at a Free Valuation form. The money is in what happens between a vendor landing at eleven at night and a time appearing in your diary, and that is the bit worth building on purpose.
What we do instead
One website, designed and written for one agency, built around the thing that actually pays: turning a vendor who is comparing three agents at eleven at night into a valuation in your diary. Their patch, their stock, their words, and pages for the towns they intend to own.
From £10,000, and the website is yours. The full detail is on the pricing page.
If you are mid contract
Ask what happens to your content and your rankings if you leave, and whether the property feed moves with you.
Questions
How much does Webdadi cost?
Their published tiers are £0 for Essentials, £3,299 for Professional, £4,399 for Executive, and bespoke from £5,499.
Why would I pay £10,000 instead?
Because the website has a job: to win instructions from vendors comparing three agents on a phone. If it does not have that job, do not spend the money.